Compare
ThreadProof vs law-firm exhibit software
The short answer
Litigation suites handle whole document sets: review, production, Bates ranges across thousands of pages, redaction workflows and trial presentation. ThreadProof handles one narrow job, a screenshot thread turned into a numbered exhibit, and does it in a browser in minutes. Firms use both: the suite for productions, ThreadProof for the client who emailed 60 screenshots this morning.
| ThreadProof | law-firm exhibit and trial software | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Screenshot and short-document exhibits | Full document review and production |
| Price | $9 to $49 a month | Commonly per-seat licences in the hundreds or thousands |
| Setup | Open a browser tab | Procurement, onboarding, training |
| Bates numbering | A running counter across a Matter, with prefix and start number | Full Bates ranges across productions, with load files |
| Where files live | On the device, unless you choose to send them | Usually a hosted repository |
| Client self-service | Send the client a link; they build the packet themselves | Rarely |
When law-firm exhibit and trial software is the better choice
- You are producing thousands of pages with load files and privilege logs.
- Multiple people need to review and tag the same set.
When ThreadProof fits
- A single thread, a single client, and a deadline this week.
- You want the client to do the tedious part without touching your document system.
Questions
- Can we use our own firm name and logo?
- Yes, on Professional. The cover page carries your organisation name and logo, and Matters keep a running Bates counter across the cases inside them.
- Do you retype anything?
- We don't retype your messages. Your screenshots are placed as images, exactly as they came off the phone, so nothing is paraphrased, corrected or re-worded on the way through.